This is a call for articles that explore different perspectives of the Mentor-Mentee Relationship in Academia.
Mentoring, and being mentored, are key aspects of the academic experience. A successful mentor-mentee relationship is enriching for both. This is a call for articles that explore different perspectives of this relationship: what works, what doesn’t and how does one navigate this relationship in these changing times. We request contributions that analyze these issues, as detailed below.
Here are the published articles in the series:
- The many ways of doing a PhD by Raghavendra Gadagkar
- Not another brick in the wall by Anjali Monteiro and K.P. Jayasankar
- Wind beneath the wings by V Madhurima
- Mentoring the marginalized by Shobhana Narasimhan
- Mentoring: an anti-view polemic by Jerry Pinto
- Mentor-Mentee relationship: an industry perspective by Prasad Phatak
- Academic and social intelligence in the mentoring process: a view from the social sciences by V. Sujatha
- Of protégés and mentors by Ram Ramaswamy
- Transitioning between mentor-mentee roles: a grad student’s reveries and woes by Arunita Banerjee
- Mentor-Mentee relationship: the ideal and the real, a perspective by N Sathyamurthy
- Mentoring as radical practice by Byasa Moharana
- Practising art teaching by Krishnapriya C P
- Feminist mentoring: reflections from the classroom and beyond by Deepa Srinivas
- Disability, Difference and Inclusive Classroom: Some Challenges by Zarana Maheshwari
- Mentor-Mentee: A New Relationship by Shivani Agrawal
- Mentoring Mathematics Research by M S Raghunathan
- Mentor-Mentee Relationship by Venkatesh Raman
- A Friend Plus by Debabrata Majumdar
- Deferred Question of Educational Justice? Unveiling the Brahminic Insouciance towards Dalits’ Education by Sanil M. Neelakandan
- Mathematics Teaching in India: Present and Future by S. M. Srivastava
- On Mentor-Mentee Relationship by Biman Bagchi
- Teacher Student Relationship in a Classroom: Recognizing the Voices and Addressing the Silences by Anurekha Chari Wagh and students
- Mentoring in Academia: One Size Does Not Fit All by Anindita Bhadra
- Interview of Prof. S. Sivaram: Mentorship experiences
Also in the series:
- Helping Hand, a cartoon by Sujit Kumar Chakrabarti
- Response to “The many ways of doing a PhD” by Chitra Kannabiran
Details of the call
A. Mentor-Mentee Relationships
We plan to focus on three kinds of relationships:
B. Points of reference:
B1. The nature of the relationship,
This includes (but is not limited to) questions like:
B2. When does the relationship break down and why?
For example, some possible reasons can be:
B3. Possible solutions, including
a) Please comment on any 1, 2 or 3 of the above points of references (i.e. B1-B3), in the context of any one of the mentor-mentee relationships (i.e. A1-A3) stated above.
b) The style of the article should be simple, precise and lucid, presenting your thoughts and reflections on the theme. No personal attacks or statements targeting individuals please, such articles will be summarily rejected. The purpose of this series is not to merely focus on the hardships faced by any one side. The purpose is to define the nature of the relationship, identify the points of friction and the reasons for the same, and come up with concrete suggestions for resolving the issues.
c) The articles should be approximately 1,500 to 3000 words.
d) The articles should be written in English. Please distinguish between data and opinion. Cite sources for the former.
e) The editorial team will read and decide the merit of your article, and decide whether to publish it or not. We are primarily looking for well-written, logically well-constructed articles that present a relevant, and preferably fresh, point-of-view. We may also suggest you to revise the draft before publishing. In any case, the decisions of the editorial team will be final and binding.
f) Please email your article IN THE BODY OF THE EMAIL to firstname.lastname@example.org on or before 31.10.2021 (Last Date extended). Please note that we are NOT going to open any attachments. Therefore, if you attach your article, we will simply not read it, and not get back to you either. It can take up to 2 weeks for us to get back to you with a decision.
g) Contributions must carry the real name of the author and aliases are not allowed. Please include a statement at the end of the article stating the name, status and affiliation of the author.
A sample author statement will look like: ABCD is a PhD scholar at XYZ University.
h) In case of any queries, please email: email@example.com.